A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that the city of Washington, D.C., unevenly enforced its “defacement” ordinances against anti-abortion groups. 

The three-judge panel ruled unanimously that city authorities treated pro-life protesters more harshly than Black Lives Matter activists and reversed a lower court’s dismissal of a complaint filed by the Frederick Douglass Foundation.

“The government may not enforce the laws in a manner that picks winners and losers in public debates,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit wrote in its opinion reversing the decision of a lower court in The Frederick Douglass Foundation v. District of Columbia. “It would undermine the First Amendment’s protections for free speech if the government could enact a content-neutral law and then discriminate against disfavored viewpoints under the cover of prosecutorial discretion.”

The Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life of America filed the lawsuit against the city after two pro-life activists were arrested on Aug. 1, 2020, for chalk graffiti reading “Black Pre-Born Lives Matter.”

“In the summer of 2020, thousands of protesters flooded the streets of the District to proclaim ‘Black Lives Matter,’” the court wrote in its decision. “Over several weeks, the protesters covered streets, sidewalks, and storefronts with paint and chalk. The markings were ubiquitous and in open violation of the District’s defacement ordinance, yet none of the protesters were arrested.”

The opinion continues, “During the same summer, District police officers arrested two pro-life advocates in a smaller protest for chalking ‘Black Pre-Born Lives Matter’ on a public sidewalk. The organizers of the smaller protest, the Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life of America (collectively ‘the Foundation’), sued.”

The foundation alleged that the protesters’ First and Fifth Amendment rights were violated — the group acknowledged that the chalk graffiti violated city ordinances, but argued Washington, D.C.’s selective enforcement of the laws was unconstitutional.

The foundation pointed to the government’s tacit approval of Black Lives Matter-themed graffiti throughout the city during the summer of 2020 as evidence that the ordinances were being selectively enforced.

A lower district court previously dismissed the foundation’s lawsuit — but the appeals court ruled Tuesday to overturn that dismissal.

“The First Amendment prohibits discrimination on the basis of viewpoint, irrespective of the government’s motive. We hold the Foundation has plausibly alleged the District discriminated on the basis of viewpoint in the selective enforcement of its defacement ordinance,” the court wrote. 

The case has been remanded for further proceedings.

“Washington officials can’t censor messages they disagree with. The right to free speech is for everyone, and we’re pleased the D.C. Circuit agreed that the Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life should be able to exercise their constitutionally protected freedom to peacefully share their views the same as anyone else,” the vice president of the Center for Life and Regulatory Practice with the Alliance Defending Freedom, Erin Hawley, said.

The ADF is providing counsel on the case.

Hawley added, “Every American deserves for their voice to be heard as they engage in important cultural and political issues of the day.”

Originally published at FoxNews.com

The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation.

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.

The post DC ‘Selectively Enforced’ Anti-Defacement Laws Against Black Lives Matter vs. Pro-Life Groups, Federal Court Rules appeared first on The Daily Signal.