Recently a friend commented that the ‘social’ justice movement in America is alive and well, and that great things have been happening. My response? When you put any word in front of the word ‘justice,’ the true meaning of justice is altered.
A modifier in preceding the word “justice” signals special treatment for a specific group or individual. Societies seek justice to protect the individual or group of individuals on a case by case basis. “Social justice” is a not-so-thinly veiled attempt to proactively offer preferential status for one group or individual over others.
A Hallowed Duty
Thomas Jefferson wrote that, “The most sacred of the duties of government is to do equal and impartial justice to all its citizens.” The hallowed duty to fulfill the promise of justice for all remains, or ideally should remain, as the guiding ideal for the people we elect to government.
When I asked my friend for an example of social justice, I was told that power lines being installed near poor neighborhoods instead of wealthier neighborhoods was a prime example. I then explained that that was not an issue related to ‘social’ justice but to justice itself, and that social justice is some group’s attempt at righting what they consider to be wrong.
2023 is not 1860, or 1960. Numerous avenues exist today for addressing meritorious issue. Locally, there are zoning boards in every municipality, city councils usually with members on the left and right, town hall meetings, public forums, newspapers, local TV stations – a variety of entities that can be brought to bear to examine an issue and to forge some type of equitable redress if needed.
The Best of the Lot
No form of political government is anywhere near perfect or even equitable, much of the time. Democracy is difficult, but all other forms of government are worse.
In a democracy, or representative republic, such as we have in the U.S., you can’t go off half-cocked and do exactly what you want because you think that a particular law is bad. You have to work to change the law, to change policies, to address inequities within the framework of democracy, and within the bound of the justice system.
Consider sanctuary cities. For a sanctuary city to exist, one has to have a mayor, city council members, an alderman, and other committee members, including those whose were elected as well as as appointed, to believe that what they’re espousing is right, while ignoring what has been passed into law. This ruling class thus by-passes what a majority of citizens count on each and every day.
Vigilantism by Any other Name
By definition, a sanctuary city is a municipality which is breaking the law. The Left will rationalize that ‘social’ justice requires breaking the law and that not all laws are good laws. Agreed: that not all laws are good laws. Laws, however they got passed, were passed as a result of a process in vogue for tens if not hundreds of years.
If laws routinely discriminate against one segment of the population versus another, then, yes, work to change the law. When you substitute or insert catchphrases into the mix, such as “social justice,” what that actually means is that you have another viewpoint of an issue. Further, you deem that your view and you actions are more meritorious than whatever came before them.
Years ago, by showing such behavior, you’d be called a vigilante. What are vigilantes? A self-appointed group of citizens who engage in policy enforcement without having legal authority, usually because they deem the legal agencies to be inadequate.
We All Have Opinions
We dwell in a society where the media is distinctly liberal, and even leftist – as we have witnessed with big tech and, unfortunately, a variety of government agencies. Thus those advocating for “social justice” have the wind at their backs. Yet, they violate the rights, and votes, of half the population and perhaps much more.
Each of us could offer a running list of issues that we’d like to change in society. If we decide, willy nilly, to start ignoring existing laws in favor of what we want to have done, how long will it take before society breaks down completely?
Taking the law into your own hands is the essence of what it means to be a vigilante. Vigilante-dominated societies are not healthy. Many of their people them live in constant fear. Ultimately, taking the law into your own hands is an ill-advised shortcut, a way to seek what you want without working through the system, however imperfect the system might be.
This country, any country, does not need more vigilantism.
– – – – –
The post Social Justice: Preferential Treatment That Circumvents Laws appeared first on Politicrossing.
This article by Jeff Davidson originally appeared on PolitiCrossing.com and is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.
- Why Not Pay Reparations to Everybody? - September 30, 2023
- 12 Things I have Learned that Could Benefit Others - September 13, 2023
- Reparations for Everyone! - August 25, 2023
New Right Network depends on your support as a patriot-ran American news network. Donate now